Okay, I've been whining about awards lately. I had a friendly exchange with Kelly last night about the Cybils (it's all in the comments) and it got me to thinking about what I would like to see in awards categories and why I've been whining so much and at the end of the day what has bugged me about all of the recent awards is two things:
They are limited by date (only 2006 books considered)
They are limited in size (only five titles in the short lists ,dammit!)
I have never bought or read books based on their pub date and the longer I review the more lax I become about covering books the minute they are released. If I tried to stay within a month, even two, of release date then I would miss dozens (a hundred?) of books a year - not to mention all those books from previous years that I don't hear about the minute they come out. As to size (or length of list) that really annoys me. As soon as you get a list of five going then every other book is forgotten and we know from all the different judges who have let out little bits about the nominating processes that they are not all in agreement ever about the final five (which makes sense as no one else ever agrees about them either.)
So why publicize final fives anyway?
I wanted to do something different - but I am one person and I can't recognize every single blasted good book in the world. Here's my idea though. For my annual awards, which I did alone last year, but I'm changing this year, I'm going to pick a subject and ask everyone and their third cousin to nominate books for that subject. I'm going to aim for children's/YA titles because there are so many adult awards out there, but if you want to nominate an adult book that works for Young Adult (teen) readers, that is cool. The catch is, the books can be published in any year - any year prior and if you have an ARC for the current year, that works to. PUBLICATION DATE DOES NOT MATTER! I'm just looking for the best books ever in my declared subject.
Here are the rules:
* This year I am looking for books that fall into the "Coming of Age" cateogory. (Thought I'd go easy this first year.) All books must predominanlty involve the protagonist coming of age. Things that knock a book out of this category: heavy plot reliance on a romance, on solving a mystery, on surviving a war, on killing aliens, etc. Also, just because your parents die does not mean you grow up - just means your parents die. So don't think that is a no-brainer inclusion. A couple of recent examples of great coming-of-age stories: An Abundance of Katherines by John Green or Queen of Cool by Cecil Castellucci. One of my all time favorites: Tam Lin by Pamela Dean. Essentially (to me anyway), a coming-of-age book is when the protagonist makes a fundamental shift from allowing events or other people to determine who they are and how they will live, to taking the reins and carving out a life of their own. That's why a dead parent book is not an automatic inclusion. Yes, you will grow up when dealing with grief but that doesn't mean you are any more enlightened about who you are inside or who you want to be. It just means you got through some grief. I think another great book example for this subject is Catherine Fisher's Corbenic - where the protagonist turns down the charge to save the Grail King and then comes to grips with that decision. (It is one of the best books I've read in ages - I reviewed it last fall.)
* The number of times a book is nominated does count as I will note the books that receive the most votes. This does not mean you should vote repeatedly for the same book - just that every different person who loves it will get to have their vote counted.
* If you really love a book than be impassioned about it! Tell me why you think it should be better known or adored. The books that nominators crow loudest about will also be noted. (Along with some of the crowing.)
* No one wins. (Except readers!) In the end, I'm looking to develop a list of books that can be taken away and used by readers or parents of readers for years and years to come. My goal is that with tons of people chipping in their thoughts, I'll be able to present a nice list to the world and say "hey - if you're looking for great coming-of-age stories then this is a decent place to start." I know that libraries do this kind of thing on some scale and so do other organizations (I imagine they do anyway, can't think of any right now), but I also know that readers will often champion a book that no one else seems to hear about. (Just ask me about Nicole Kelby's Theater of the Stars, still one of the best books no one has ever heard of that I adore.)
* Oh - genre doesn't matter! If you want to nominate a graphic novel or trade, that is cool too!
So, all you have to do is leave a comment or email me at colleenatchasingraydotcom and I will tally nominees. I'll let ya know every few days how books are faring and give running lists. I don't know when I'll be done - a couple of weeks? Maybe three? How about official announcement at the end of February? That works.
All nominees accepted until February 27!
Official announcement and release of list on February 28!
Link to this post everywhere and send me your book titles, please!
Okay guys, let the games begin..............
UPDATED: A note on comments postings - for some reason, Moveable Type is holding some comments and immediately posting others. (It holds mine!!!) I've asked my web designer for help, but in the meantime I'll be checking constantly and try to stay on top of it. Hopefully it will be fixed soon!


![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.chasingray.com/nav-commenters.gif)






January 31
2007
03:38 PM
What a great idea! I agree with you on publication date (although not for the awards necessarily--they have to be limited somehow). However, in my personal reading, I am much less concerned with reading what's new than with reading what's compelling.