RSS: RSS Feed Icon

I have a new review up over at Voices. Voyage of Midnight is an amazing YA novel about the slave trade, especially the Middle Passage. If you are looking for a book on this subject you will not find better than this one. As an added bonus, since it involves a young boy who goes to sea, it will especially appeal to boys. This one is most highly recommended - it blew me away and I thought I already knew a lot about this subject.

Glorifying Terrorism is sitting beside me as a I type - it arrived today and I'm thrilled to see it. I'm all about striking blows for freedom of speech lately, and this book looks to include some powerful stories. (With contributors like Jo Walton, Hal Duncan and Charles Stross, it is a guaranteed winner as far as I'm concerned.)

I just received an ARC of the massive Connie Willis compendium from Subterranean Press. I haven't really started reading it yet, but I noticed in her Intro she discusses her love for screwball comedies. She clearly has that in common with Kage Baker and if you like that sort of movie as well then you must - YOU MUST - read Baker's fabulous Rude Mechanicals. I reviewed it along with her other new collection, Gods and Pawns, in Bookslut this month. Honestly, I don't care if you like Sci Fi or not, if you love Carole Lombard in My Man Godfrey then Rude Mechanicals will totally crack you up.

The Spring issue of Subterranean Magazine continues to go online with fiction from Jay Lake, Bruce Sterling and more. I am finding Elizabeth Bear's columns on writing to be most interesting. To wit:

As a writer, you have to be able to set limits on what you are or are not willing to do. I personally would recommend not writing anything you're not sufficiently passionate about to really want to write.

And readers, in addition to being fickle, are psychic.

They can tell if you don't care. Not-caring is boring. And if the slush reader is bored, the regular reader is going to be bored too.

The bad news is, not-caring is not the only form of being boring. My slush is full of stories about which the writer obviously cares deeply. Those may be unpublishable for a variety of other reasons.

As a slush reader, I have a list of other things that I have come to find boring. Preachiness is boring. Predictability is boring. Twist endings are boring.

Most of the things aspiring writers do to punch up the beginning of a story are boring. (Explosions, sex, shocking revelations, the inevitable heat death of the universe.) All that stuff is boring.

The best part about what Bear is saying is that she's just saying it - no beating around the bush bullshit. How refreshing!

Said Hyder Akbar and two other Yale students were arrested this week for buring an American flag - and also maybe almost burning someone's house down. It's very odd anyway, but I was shocked to see Hyder involved in this. I interviewed him last year after reading his amazing memoir, Come Back to Afghanistan. Such a nice guy and his editors at Bloomsbury really seemed to like him. I don't know what these guys were doing (I'm thinking some alcohol was involved), but I hope it gets sorted out soon.

And finally over at the Booklist blog, the argument is made that it's okay for David Sedaris to make stuff up and call it nonfiction because he is funny. I don't feel good about this - I think nonfiction is nonfiction and that should be it. If you aren't telling the truth then you aren't writing nonfiction. Maybe this is just a sore spot for me as the fiction/nonfiction issue has come up with my book (all the flying is true but the people are purely fiction, and that makes it fiction, or so I thought).

I don't know - did I miss a memo or something? Is it okay for memoirs to be fictional as long as they are funny?

comments

I'm hoping that Willis' book -- a "career retrospective" -- isn't an indication that she's done writing...

Bear moves from boring to dumb and I like it. Oscar Wilde sez all bad poetry is earnest but I think I got that from Harold Bloom.

The Hood Company

Hi there, Colleen. As I wrote in my post about Sedaris, I know it's a kind of fuzzy distinction: if a memoir is only half-funny, is it OK for the writer to tell half-truths? I guess what I was trying to get at was my shock that Heard was comparing David Sedaris to Jayson Blair--and that he could feel suckered by Sedaris. Probably Sedaris should be filed under fiction, but it's largely a publishing label, and I don't think it's worth getting too exercised about what publishers do to sell books. We all know they'll do a lot, so when a case is as obvious as Sedaris, we should just use our common sense in evaluating it. It's one thing to be James Frey and do interviews saying, "My life was a living hell, and this is my true story," and another thing to tell stories about being a Macy's elf. But there's all sorts of great fodder here for discussing what makes nonfiction "true." After all, many interviewers condense and rephrase their subjects' remarks, and in most forms of nonfiction it's considered acceptable to condense and reorder in order to present a larger "truth". And even the most sincere autobiographies are likely chock full of misstatements because of our own tendency to create smooth narratives out of messy fact. (Richard Powers' The Echo Maker is wonderfully thought-provoking here....) Anyway, thanks for reading!

I totally see what you mean about the comparison between Frey and Sedaris, Keir and I do agree that it is crazy to compare those two types of writing. But I just still have a knee jerk reaction about nonfiction. I mean if history writers must adhere to the highest standards for nonfic (and same goes for biographers), why do memorists get a pass?

Thanks so much for coming by though, and clearing up any confusion over the point you were making!

I think we're basically in agreement, Colleen, because I'd call Frey a memoirist and Sedaris a humorist!

Oh, no--two "This American Life" idols slain (or, well, exposed as having feet of clay) in one fell post!

Now that I think of it, I must have always assumed Sedaris was exaggerating somewhat. but Hyder seemed like such a nice guy in his TAL pieces.

I'm really just shocked by this and interested to see what comes out. (I'm hoping they were just drunk and stupid - how often is that the defense that you hope for?)

Post a comment