RSS: RSS Feed Icon

I've been a fan of Poppy Z. Brite's Liquor series for quite some time (read my recent review at Voices of Soul Kitchen and D*U*C*K to see how much I love these books). I was very disappointed then to read the letter from her editor that she posted yesterday. Here's a bit:

I think we’ve suffered because there isn’t a single target audience for the series, but several smaller ones, and we’ve tried to get to all of them, to varying degrees of success. We have not been able to tap into the core mystery market, due to content that slants somewhat outside what is the norm for this genre, but also your apprehension on this front. The gay market has responded, but only in the somewhat expected minimal way, and the “foodie fiction� reader we have tried to grab seems to be as elusive as a good bagel in my home town. Even Tony Bourdain’s forays into this genre have been met with so-so sales. Honestly, I think we’ve cast the net too wide and pulled in a small catch in the process.

This leads me to my next concern. The two plots you propose fall even farther outside of the mystery genre, a conscious decision on your part but one I feel will limit our reach that much more. I appreciate that you wish to develop the post-Katrina story, and the character of Lenny Duveteaux, but I worry that we’ll see increasingly diminishing returns with a decided shift from what you call the “murder-mystery-type plot.�

I know this is not the answer you were hoping for regarding HURRICANE STEW and DOUBLE SHOT, but I hope you will take this to heart—you are a writer with many fans out there, and I have truly valued being your publisher. Our decision to not move forward with this series will in now way affect our commitment to publishing DEAD SHRIMP BLUES well, and with enthusiasm for you and for the cap of our series. I’d very much like to continue our relationship, and take it into a different direction that will hopefully carry appeal for a far wider readership, leading to better results for both you and Crown.

One of the things that surprised me when reviewing Soul Kitchen was that the publisher marketed it as a murder mystery. While there is a murder in the opening pages (and the wrong person is convicted for the crime), solving the murder is only one small part of the story. It's not like Rickey and G-man play detective - that could not be further from the truth. I did not enjoy this book as a mystery really at all - I enjoyed it as the regional fiction that it is. I love soaking up the New Orleans atmosphere and the relationship ups and downs between Rickey and G-man plus how they get along with their family and friends and all the professional drama. It's just fiction more than anything else, wonderful to read, pleasurable to sink into, addictive from start to finish, fiction.

So why the hell can't they just sell it as that?

Why can't the PR people just sell it as fiction, why must it be a mystery or "foodie fiction" or gay or whatever else they decide to sell it as? When did we have to try and turn fiction into genre? It's bizarre enough to me that purely genre books (like YA science fiction) are not called that - but now a purely literary series must be delegated as genre (pick a genre, any genre) in order to find an audience.

And since that doesn't work (duh), the author is shut out.

It is exactly this sort of "one size fits all" attitude towards reading (and writing) that frustrates me so much. When I read about a proven novelist like Poppy being told to "write the definitive Katrina novel" instead of simply writing about people living, loving and working in New Orleans then I see the very small chance that a book like my AK Flying book really has. It is not a conventionally written plot-driven novel (like Poppy's are), it's set in an unusual but not exotic location (whereas Poppy's are) and it involves no romantic relationships at all (but Poppy's do - and the relationship has evolved through each succeeding title). So really - other than some flying, dying and living large in the Last Frontier, what do I have to offer?

My book is not a genre title - no way, no how. And if that's what the PR machines want (or require) then what do we do?

Anyone got an answer for that?

comments

DIY.

As you well know, I agree with Richard. There's a change coming...

Because readers don't think to themselves, "Gee, I want to read a random novel, of the tens of thousands available" -- they want to read something specific, something like other books that they have enjoyed. That's all a genre is: a group of readers who are willing to try new books and new writers in hopes of finding things like ones they've enjoyed in the past.

Genres live and die, and only stick around as long as they're useful. (Seen a nurse novel lately?) But, as long as there are readers who want a specific kind of book, that genre will live, and writers who can write the books they want within that genre will flourish.

Publishing a book as "general fiction" is tantamount to saying "we don't know who, if anyone, will want this thing, but here it is." Everything that looks like it's being published as "just plain fiction" is actually some stealth genre -- most commonly, The New Book By This Bestseller, but also such things as More Exquisitely Written MFA Stories In Which Nothing Happens, We Don't Call Them Family Sagas Anymore, and Several Women Friends Have Lunch Repeatedly. Aiming a book at everyone is effectively the same as aiming it at no one, and usually has the same effect.

I don't think I agree with you Andrew - I do go looking for novels all the time and I find them - by Andrea Barrett, Robert Hellenga, Martha Cooley, Michael Ondaatje (before anyone knew him) and on and on.
Where in your rather condescending "stealth genre" list would you fit novels like The Great Gatsby or The Old Man and the Sea?

Have you forgotten that they were simply novels before they were bestsellers?

I love a good genre novel as much as the next person but I think dismissing books that don't fit in genre assignments as "we don't know who, if anyone, will want this thing, but here it is," is a bit of an extreme.

I mean really - did you mean to sound this harsh?

Post a comment

Comment preview:




Newest Colleen in Lit World