RSS: RSS Feed Icon

Here's a charming little comment from a writer:

Writing has ruined my life and cost me many, many girlfriends. I have thrown away several careers and one college degree to spend my time working in bars, D.J.'ing in bars and drinking my rejection letters away. I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy, and I've made many of them since I started...I also abandoned my agent with words harsher than those I've saved for lost loves."

It's courtesy 25 year old Brendan Sullivan as quoted in the New York Observer under a headline "My Book Deal Ruined My Life".

You have got to be kidding me.

Daniel Smith got a book deal to write about his deceased father who heard voices in his head and then found the actual writing of the book so difficult that “I thought about getting into painting houses or digging ditches, doing anything other than writing—making watches or something like that.� Spoken like someone who has never dug a ditch in his life. If he had, trust me - he wouldn't be thinking of it as something easier.

Here's another fun bit about what you miss by becoming a fulltime writer with a contract:

The freedom of setting one’s own schedule, of course, is another gift of the book contract—for some, it’s the very motivation to pitch a book in the first place. Work for a few hours, go to yoga, work a little more, eat a sandwich …. It’s a fantasy of independence, without daily or weekly deadlines imposed from above, without being picked at by your nosy co-worker. But then…You miss the co-worker: the ruminations on last night’s Sopranos at the coffee machine, the bitching about deadlines over lunch. You even long for their Z100 sing-alongs and screeching renditions of “Since U Been Gone.�

Um, what? You miss bitching about deadlines - someone else's deadlines, someone else's idea of what is important? You miss coffee machine discussions about tv? Are you in solitary confinement or something from the moment you sign a contract? No one told me this. I thought you just continue writing like you did before and still have your life.

Hello, published authors - you do still have your lives to keep, don't you?

But then again maybe what Rachel Sklar did is what writers under contract are supposed to do:

Ms. Sklar took six weeks off from her blogging job to uniform herself in fuzzy sweatpants, tie her hair into a bun, surround herself in books from the library and Amazon.com, guzzle Diet Coke and immerse herself in Jewry.

“The stack of books kept me where I was. I wasn’t going out, I wasn’t shopping …. I berated myself and may have had a few meltdowns. Well, I definitely had a few meltdowns. But you know, a friend of mine came over at 1:30 [after] a movie premiere with a six-pack of Diet Coke and a box of cupcakes, and it was the greatest pick-me-up ever.�

Um, I wrote an entire book while wearing functional clothing, eating and drinking like a normal person and interacting on a daily basis with my husband and child (and dogs and assorted other family members). I never put my hair in a bun; I would have remembered if the bun thing happened.

And then there is Anna Holmes, who is probably going to win for cliche of the week, commenting on life after the book was done:

“I had a hard time getting myself back into my quote-unquote normal life, because I actually started enjoying my [own] company so much and the solitude of it all. I didn’t even want to go out,� Ms. Holmes continued. “I still tend to kind of want to be at home and read and, you know, [become] a cat lady, with my cats.�

Of course it figures that she is a blogger also. If she lived in Terra Haute I might scream or something.

And then there is the issue of the advance, which apparently is not really much:

“When I hear a book deal, I think, ‘Oh, that person made a 100 grand.’ When I have a low-five-figure advance, I call it, like, a small gift, I suppose,� said Ms. Holmes.

She also learned that her publisher wouldn’t pay for the rights to print the breakup letters she wanted to include in the collection. “The advance I got was not money that I could live on; it was money that had to be used to pay permissions for the book,� she said.

Although Mr. Smith said he was able to survive on his advance, he admits that those six-figure deals can quickly dwindle away over the three or four years it takes to write a book. “You’re basically making 30 or 40 grand a year, and that’s not that great of a salary …. It’s really not as much as it seems. These numbers can be very deceptive.�

And poor Brendan? He is really having a rough time:

Mr. Sullivan has held 27 jobs to support his writing career, from selling chapstick on the street to being a night guard in an art gallery (“That was my favorite job ever, because I just sat in a chair and read novels all day,� Mr. Sullivan added.)

He is currently working on his second novel. His first one, well, “There are eight drafts of it—they’re in my basement right now,� he said in a phone interview from his Fort Greene apartment. He trashed the novel after he got into a public fight with his first agent and decided to start anew. “You have to learn how to suppress your gag reflex in order to get anything out. Like in love, you make a lot of mistakes and you learn from them.�

Okay, you already know what I think about all this (I can't keep the sarcasm to myself, even when quoting), but let me explain why I have no pity for writers who support themselves through writing. My father was a wastewater treatment plant supervisor. He worked in sewage almost his entire adult life (more than 30 years). He had acidic chemicals splashed on his face once, he wore steel toe boots because of dropping manhole covers and he died at the age of 60, after a diagnosis similar to several co-workers, from a cancer that no one could explain - except that maybe some of the chemicals he worked with over his career had killed him.

That is hard work.

My pepere drove an oil delivery truck for FIFTY years in Rhode Island. He showed up and drove no matter the weather - no matter the blizzard - because people depended on him; his family depended on him.

That is hard work.

My great grandfather, who I never met, left Canada for the US to give his children a better way of life. He was a farmer who moved to town and a carpenter who could not support his family through his craft. So he worked the textile mills in Rhode Island in the 1920s and 30s. Have you read stories about those mills? People died in those places.

That is hard work.

I agree that writing is not easy - and I know from first hand experience that it is hard. But there is a whale of difference between something being hard and it being hard work. Sitting in a clean house, with heat and food and running water while you create something of your own making - while you let your imagination run loose and take you places you never thought possible - that is pleasure; that is beauty.

In the grand scheme of things, that is damn easy.

Research might be tedious, deadlines might be frightful, staying up late at night to pound the keys might be tiring but do not think for a minute that any of this constitutes hard work. If you have seen hard work, lived with it, practiced it, maybe even lost your heart and soul to it, then you would know the difference.

You would know why I have no pity for writers who whine.

Loading airplanes at 40 below zero is hard work but I had it easy. I could always walk inside to my desk and my heater and let the guys do it; I was just helping - the rampers had to be out there. And doing the job in Fairbanks is nothing compared to loading airplanes - fueling airplanes - at the top of the world with a wind chill of 120 below zero and sky that has not seen daylight in months. That is bitter, brutal, back breaking work.

It will even make you a little bit crazy.

I remember when that work was what my friends did and I was the one who sent them to do it. And now I write about it at my table, with my glass of ice tea and the radio in the background and the dog asleep at my feet. The day I sign a book contract I will be grateful and I will be happy but even then I will be remembering.

In a just world the first phone call after that news would be to my father, to thank him for all those years doing hard work he hated so his kids could have better. But I believe he will know anyway; it's the sort of thing I have to believe he will know. And he will understand why I'm telling you right now that writing is one of the easiest jobs I've ever had.

"...30 or 40 grand a year, and that's not a great salary..." Then go get a hard job dear writer, and see how tough working for that salary can be.

comments

Thank you. For one teeny moment, I felt like whining today. Now I'm picturing your boot in my butt if I do.

Could you design a "No Whining" logo that writers could post on their websites/blogs?

When I first read your post, I thought, "Oh, she didn't realize this article was a parody." Then I went to the article. I'm still unsure, but it's not April Fools' Day so I suppose it is "serious" if totally laughable.

Having a book contract is a great privilege thousands of people would in fact pay considerable amounts to achieve. I'm very grateful to have had books published, no matter what I earned from them or how they sold.

Yes, there's a human reaction to all good fortune called habituation (see _Stumbling on Happiness_), but the complaints in this article sound ludicrous. No doubt the feelings are genuine, but it's embarrassing for the writers to go public with them.

Everyone complains. When I got a job paying a salary twice what I had been previously earning, I was ecstatic. But then, as I got used to the extra income, I'd complain -- to myself, my therapist and close friends -- about the long hours, the pressure to do well, the stress of some of the things I had to do.

The vast majority of authors in the U.S., as documented by the Authors Guild in surveys of its members, do not earn enough from their books to support themselves and their families. Most have jobs, supportive working spouses, family wealth or some other way to survive financially and emotionally. And many who don't need the money contiune to do their day jobs because they value what the jobs offer them, whether it's companionship, a sense that they're helping someone, or simply the pleasures of routine.

Yes, I've been in that unventilated phone booth at MacDowell, and it can be stuffy. But at the time I was getting free (excellent) food and board, stimulating company, solitude to work, a beautiful setting, and staff members concerned with almost my every need.

Of course an article about authors (or anyone else) who are grateful for their lot probably isn't news because it's the norm.

I'm going to add this to my collection of Favorite Truths About Writing.

I read my first truthful essay last year when I read Garrison Keillor's piece in Salon titled "Writers, Quit Whining." Obviously a few of the aforementioned need to READ this and realize that they're not out planting four hundred acres of alfalfa, they're typing.

As Keillor said, "It's the purest form of arrogance: Lest you don't notice what a brilliant artist I am, let me tell you how I agonize over my work. To which I say: Get a job. Try teaching eighth-grade English, five classes a day, 35 kids in a class, from September to June, and then tell us about suffering."

People often are ashamed of real work - I grew up being embarrassed at being the janitor's daughter, and now I feel like I'm not really working sometimes. Where are the people who feel like they should be doing more? Maybe out there, doing it, unsung. Hm.

Sara: A "No Whining" button would be hilarious!

Richard: I thought they had to be kidding at first as well, but the comments from Nathan Englander were true (partly taken from Bookslut). And I didn't really disagree with him - I'm sure the pressure after such a long break between books was harsh emotionally. But overall, these really are just annoying people who don't want to recognize how lucky they are.

And yes, TadMack, I don't think I ever told the kids I went to school with what my father did for a living either. And that is beyond sad and stupid. Now I look at how my life is and I can't believe it. You will never hear me bitching about writing; it's just so easy compared to what I've seen. (And what you've seen and what Jenny D. has seen and on and on and on.)

Cobb

Stop whining about the whining. It is the hardest work because it's mentally and psychically hard. I'd much rather bust my ass at physical work in the freezing cold, etc., etc. I found the article inspiring.

I'm sorry, you're going to have to explain to me how writing is psychically (is that a word?) hard.

And as far as a preference for busting your ass in the freezing cold - fine. Go do it.

"I agree that writing is not easy - and I know from first hand experience that it is hard. But there is a whale of difference between something being hard and it being hard work."

Yup. I've done both, and there is a world of difference. Never anything nearly as hard as your dad or pepere, but my share of hauling and stringing television cable in the snow, washing dishes in a restaurant, working three jobs as a full-time college student... And I've had the corporate executive jobs too, which are hard not in physical labor but in terms of the sheer emotional freight, the responsibility for the workplace well-being and livelihoods of so many people, and, by extension, their families. At least, those are things that kept me up nights.

And writing, as I do now, is seven million times easier. Writing is hard sometimes, and sometimes I work hard at it, but it does not ever leave me crying in despair at the thought of having to get up and do it all over again tomorrow. I may (okay, I do) whine in private to my sweetie, also a writer, about actual issues of the work -- but never about having the chance to do it.

Maybe these folks in the article just couldn't deal with the ambiguity and ambivalence of a profession that confers so much cultural credibility but (for the most part) offers so little actual reward in the terms that we're taught to prize: money, celebrity, perpetual approval and convenience and happiness. Blah, blah. Book deals don't screw up people's lives, choices do.

You're right Kelley, I'm sure running a business is its own kind of hard - or even being director of a movie (new insight gained from Always) or that kind of thing.

What got me about the article was the subtle comparison to blue collar work, I guess - or Sullivan whining about the DJ or bar tending jobs.

I like your last line best: it is always a choice, all of it. So just accept your choice and get going with it.

I think there are all kinds of hard. But I think the kind of hard that you were talking about in your post has to do (if I am reading correctly) with more than just choice; it has to do with responsibility (which is, of course, its own kind of choice).

The thing is, I think that on some level in this culture "hard work" means "work without joy, work without soul satisfaction." The kind of work that is associated more with responsibility than with the joy and satisfaction of personal expression. But the cultural mystique of the arts is that writing is the latter, rather than the former. If it's not, why do it? That's what makes me grumpy about the article, is that on some level I read it as people complaining that they weren't getting the personal satisfaction from writing -- to which I say, feh, then make another choice.

Will go do more thinking about this.

K

Yes Kelley - that's it exactly. I do realize that there is nearly always some element of choice, although I would argue that in case of my father, pepere and ggrandfather (and probably TadMack's father), the choice is limited. Back then you took the job you got and you kept it because security was critical to support your family. If you look at the guys I work with you could certainly say they chose to freeze their butts off and fly and that is true - and while we all complained about the weather (please - who wouldn't?!) we knew we were there because of the higher pay (in my case and most of theirs) and also - for the pilots - because of the increased flight time; something would not be happening elsewhere.

That's why pilots go to AK usually in the first place.

So it's all choice to one degree or another and I don't understand why writing has to be considered such a tough choice. As you say, if you do not like it then make another choice.

And as to why you have to write in ratty clothes while eating bad food - well that I can not answer at all. (Other than to suggest that there is some work at maintaining an artistic cliche with that sort of response.)

Another great post and thought-provoking discussion. My fellow blogstress TadMack posed the interesting question of where all the people are who think they should be doing more... Well, I'm definitely one of them--I feel very lucky to have the opportunity to even attempt to be a writer, artist and freelancer rather than going back to the day jobs and annoying temp work I've spent plenty of time doing, and I'm under no illusions than anything I've ever done in my life was "hard work" in the sense you're talking about.

I've certainly worked hard, and continue to do so--and like many of the other commenters, there are specific issues I complain about, but aside from the occasional whining to myself about why I chose this life instead of doing something practical like my dad always told me to do, I really do feel very fortunate. As a result, I often do feel like I should be doing more, and therefore I have trouble saying no to any new projects...and always feel very driven to attach myself to more, more, more. But there's only so many hours in a day...

And the artistic cliches! On that topic, what really annoys me is all the mystical language surrounding creative writing, art, or what-have-you, all the mumbo-jumbo that obscures the part of writing that is actual work--mental work, that is, not hard work!! :)

Post a comment

Comment preview:




Newest Colleen in Lit World