RSS: RSS Feed Icon


I reviewed The McElderry Book of Greek Myths a couple of months ago along with Charles R. Smith's The Mighty Twelve and Lynn Curlee's Mythological Creatures. At the time I was quite pleased to have three gorgeous books on myths and mythological creatures land in my lap and saw this as a renaissance for one of the standard subjects in children's and teen publishing.

Basically I was thinking that as the myths never go out of style and every kid in the world ends up learning them at some point, it was awesome to see publishers revising the rather dry standards we've all grown up with. (We all love D'Aulaire's but if you're looking for attitude in those retellings you won't find it.) Also, very young children (kindergarten age) are often ready for the myths, but colorful illustrations are pretty much mandatory for that crowd. While I enjoyed all three of the books I reviewed (and my son did as well), it was Eric Kimmel's retelling in the McElderry book, along with Pep Montserrat's outstanding illustrations, that really stood out. I naively thought that Kimmel was likely on his way to a whole series of books on the subject and happily settled back to wait for the next entry (hopefully on the Norse myths).

Unfortunately, my literary optimism this time was dead wrong.

I can't begin to express, as a reader and parent, how disappointed I am in Simon & Schuster for not continuing this series. Kimmel did a great job of including not only the "standards" (Persephone & Hades, Theseus & the Minotaur, Daedelus & Icarus) but also some lesser known myths such as Prometheus and Pygmalion & Galatea. He also retold them all in a manner that injected a lot of fresh blood into the tales. As I wrote last summer: Kimmel is not writing adoring tales but shows both the nobility and pettiness of everyone involved and will likely cause readers to identify quite a bit with his subjects. Midas truly is a ninny here, Medea is crazy, and Ariadne gets her due for providing her critical assistance against the Minotaur.

These are plainly 21st century versions of old stories - the tales have not changed dramatically but Kimmel allows himself to consider just why some of the characters behaved in a certain way. Theseus is a bit of a cad and Icarus not merely thoughtless for flying so close to the sun, but more wistful at the chance to attain great heights after years of imprisonment. Orpheus and Eurydice have a love that knows no bounds and this second meeting with Hades and Persephone merely solidifies what careful readers will have already gathered from their tale: that sometimes opposites do attract and Hell's ruler is a lot more complicated then you might think. (How this tale ended up with a happy ending I'll never know, but it did and is one of my favorites.)

Montserrat's deeply emotional and richly colored illustrations perfectly match the depth that Kimmel attains with his words. Altogether, The McElderry Book of Greek Myths was the sort of gift package that I could see as perfect reading aloud to young children (as I have done, more than once) while also working well for older reluctant readers or those just starting to learn about the myths and looking to get their feet wet slowly before diving into Edith Hamilton. This is a timeless book and I don't say that lightly. I could see Kimmel and Montserrat's work appealing to children over a period of decades just as those that have come before them have managed to do. That is why I was so surprised to hear that the book is not going to have a sequel, a decision that seems remarkably short-sighted to me.

But then again maybe I shouldn't be surprised since no one seems to look beyond six months when planning anything in this blasted country anymore. (And I say that with all the love of a true American.)

So here's the deal. The book has apparently not sold enough copies to justify another. Why anyone would look at sales figures in only one year for a book on myths and use that to predict future earnings I will never understand as it is a subject that everyone and their third cousin knows will never go out of style. I managed to pick up an out-of-print picture book on Norse myths while I was at Powells for the conference but although my son is happy to hear them, he has already mentioned that it is not as good as his favorite. You want to know the biggest irony? Powells had more than a dozen copies of The McElderry Book of Greek Myths facing out in the children's folklore section. Clearly they can see the book has a lot of appeal for their customers. Maybe someone should make a phone call to the powers-that-be at Simon and Schuster and suggest they reconsider their decision.

In the meantime we will return to Persephone, Hades and crew again in my house and wish that Eric Kimmel and Pep Montserrat were able to entertain us with other titles as well. When two talents fit together so well you would think a publisher would celebrate their synergy and reward them - and the reading public - with more chances to shine. An opportunity is being wasted here and I can't believe I'm the only parent to notice it.

ALSO: Go see Tanita's great post on Beverly Cleary's Jean and Johnny: "I wish you could see my copy of the book. Harper Collins has done a reissue, and so all of the new editions are bound either in sort of girly-pink with party dresses or sort of random pink with hamburgers and telephones and other stereotypical sixties teen era detailing. Now I love the pink and I love the sixties, don't get me wrong, but this is an atypical YA romance, and I prefer my cover. My library bound, 1965 edition of Jean and Johnny, which was first published in 1959, is a distinct brick red and has a beige and black drawing on the front of a boy in a plaid shirt walking with a shy-looking girl with horn-rimmed glasses and a realistically slightly terrified expression. It's adorable."

How on earth did I miss this book? It sounds lovely!

comments

Thanks for your terrific comments, Colleen. I'll save this to read on those bleak days when reviews are rotten and all the manuscripts are coming back with little notes attached wishing me luck with another editor.

Karen Wojtyla was my editor on this project, and she's one of the best in the business. She recruited me. She asked, "How would you like to do a collection of Greek myths?" I jumped at the chance, since I grew up loving the D'Aulaire's versions of the stories. Karen picked Pep to be the illustrator. An inspired choice. The artwork is breathtaking. For those who believe that the author and artist work closely together, I must confess that Pep and I have yet to have any contact. We were the horses; Karen held the reins. That's often how it works, which is why having an editor whose judgment you respect and trust is so important.

So why don't we do the Norse myths, or another mythic cycle? That, unfor-tunately, is not up to me or Karen. It's a corporate decision. The question is not whether or not the book has done well. It's how well has it done? How many copies were sold? Did it sell enough to meet the company's definition of a successful book? That's a high bar in these post-Harry Potter days. And that's the reason why you see so many series books, celebrity books, pirate and dragon books. Publishers have to go where the dollars are.

Schools and libraries used to account for 80% of children's book sales. Today it's more like 10% and falling. Publishers have to sell directly to children and parents. That's an entirely different kind of marketing. It results in a different kind of book. Like it or not, this is the world we live in.

I'm not complaining. I fulfilled a lifelong dream of having the opportunity to create a collection of Greek myths. I couldn't have done a better or more beautiful book. Maybe someday I'll have the chance to wrestle with Thor and Odin. Or there might be another project, just as exciting, around the bend.

I'll let you know what develops.

Thanks for explaining all this, Eric - I really really appreciate it and I look forward to hearing what you due out next.

I just discovered this post and felt I should say thank you for your nice words about the art I did for this book and about the book itself. I agree with Eric that for an author who started as a reader before of writing or drawing, it is a big goal to have the chance to work on the Greek Myths subject. So when it comes to happen to you, you deeply feel it won't happen again. And at this moment I took it knowing its importance.
So I just had to do the right thing: do the best I could do to show emotions and breath that the words had on the actions and characters they depict.
It was a big pleasure working on Eric's approach to the Greek Myths, and some suffering too... suffering one can't avoid being selfdemanding.
(Thank you, Eric! Hope one day we can work together again!)
And agree with the point he explains in his words about publishing and marketing.
Yes, this is a different kind of book.
But I'm a lucky guy who had the chance to work on a diferent approach to Greek Mythology after this one: last year I worked in a version of Homer's Odissey wich brings the text to children and young readers in a catalan and spanish translation wich kept some essence and high level of homeric using of language bringing to this edition a kind of feeling of eternity.
The art is totally done on paper with mixed media and avoiding computer as a part of an intention to keep the same feeling of eternity on the images, using collage and the idea of restoration and palimpsests...
You can see some art in these links, if you feel like to:

http://pepmontserratnews.blogspot.com/2009/01/lodissea-per-joves-lectors.html

http://pepmontserratnews.blogspot.com/2009/02/un-poco-mas-de-odisea.html

Thanks again.

Pep:

Thanks so much for stopping by and commenting! Your book is still a big hit around my house - we just love it and I continue to hope that at some point you and Eric could team up for another myths/legends collection.

And Thanks especially for the links - GREAT STUFF!

Post a comment

Comment preview:




Newest Colleen in Lit World