RSS: RSS Feed Icon

I rarely write here about aviation matters but if you're interested in airline safety then you need to read the WSJ article up today on the Buffalo crash. Every time someone mentions a cheap air fare on a commuter I shake my head. I don't think most people realize how incredibly low paying the pilot jobs are in the commuters - I doubt the co-pilot in the Buffalo crash was making $20,000 a year. Here's a bit of the WSJ piece:

The crew initially didn't notice the plane's speed had dropped dangerously low, sliding under 115 miles an hour, and risked going into a stall. The slowing speed set off an emergency system called a "stick-pusher," which pushes the control column down in order to send the aircraft into a temporary dive so it can regain speed and recover from a stall.


However, Capt. Renslow tried to force the plane to do the opposite. He yanked back on the controls while adding thrust. His effort was strong enough to manually override the stick-pusher. Within seconds, the plane lost lift, bucked violently and started to roll. It slammed into a house five miles from the runway.

Colgan's standard training program stops short of demonstrating the operation of the stick-pusher in flight simulators. Without such hands-on experience, safety investigators argue, pilots could be surprised and not react properly when the stick-pusher activates during an emergency. The FAA is required to sign off on all airline training manuals.


They should have hands-on training with the stick-pusher response and I bet in the wake of this crash there will be a new rule requiring all airlines operating aircraft with this technology must do so. As for the captain's response, well I'm not surprised. Everyone I knew in the industry called this one pilot error from the very beginning.

comments

Have you read Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell? He has a section on airline safety. He says that the way people learn to relate to one another, particularly within a hierarchy, has an impact on how pilots communicate with one another and with air traffic controllers. The culture one grows up in and lives within can influence this kind of communication.

Which isn't what you are talking about here, but I thought you might be interested.

I haven't read that yet Gail - although it sounds alot like Cockpit Resource Management. This is a training system that was incorporated into pretty much all two-pilot crew training after a string of accidents a couple of decades ago concerning crews where the co-pilot and capt didn't relate well to each other at all - the Detroit crash comes to mind where the co-pilot repeatedly said the plane needed more deicing, the capt disagreed, and they crashed on takeoff. Only one little girl survived.

The idea is that regardless of where you come from, all habits are to be broken and reformed through effective CRM. The Hudson River crash is an example of perfect CRM - those guys worked like a well oiled machine (obviously). I would be interested in the case of Buffalo to see what the co-pilot was screaming as the capt grabbed the yoke and made such a colossal mistake. Did she wrestle him for control? Should be interesting to know what happened there (and it will eventually all come out).

Post a comment

Comment preview:




Newest Colleen in Lit World