RSS: RSS Feed Icon

There have been a few emails lately making the rounds to bloggers asking for participation in a variety of blog tours. I've taken them with a grain of salt but when Roger had one blindly sent to him and then responded with a hysterical post, I thought maybe it was time to address what the problem is here: most authors don't have a clue how to connect with the lit blogosphere.

First, I'm not addressing authors who have had blogs or LJs set up for years and interact on a regular basis via thoughtful and engaging posts. I'm talking to authors who either have no web site at all or have a static site with just basic info. Then they have a new book come out and the marketing dept at their publisher tells them to get out there and sell books on the blogosphere. The rash of recent discussions on blog tours seems to have convinced folks that all they have to do is sign up with a company that will organize one for them or send out a couple of dozen emails to various bloggers they don't even know (and based on the emails I've gotten they clearly don't know who they're contacting) and popularity will ensue. Basically, if they let random bloggers know they are ready to tour on certain days then many bloggers will sign up for the privilege. (And why on earth you would want to interview with a blog you've never heard of, I'll never understand.)

I know why authors are thinking this is a good idea - everyone says blog tours are just virtual bookstore tours and with bookstores your publicist contacted the stores, let them know when you would be in town and scheduled a signing. Easy. But here's the thing - bookstores did that because they made sales from your signing. Bookstores want authors to stop by and read and sign because it makes them money so bookstores were/are very accommodating. But in the blogosphere the only reward for a blogger - who has to conduct the interview, transcribe it, add graphics, etc., is the ever elusive promise of more readers. The book tour organizer will get paid, the author will get exposure and the blogger will get maybe something or maybe nothing. And that is why a lot of bloggers (myself included) do not participate in conventional blog tours.

To be blunt, it's just not worth our time.

So what is an author to do? You want to sell your book and we get that. But listen to me - participating in a tour with 20 or 30 blogs all of whom will invariably ask you the same questions thus rendering many of their interviews dull and pointless (both for you to answer and for anyone to read) will get you a minimal return at best. Is it better than nothing? Sure - any exposure is good. But don't think this is the only way or the best way to tackle the lit blogosphere. Unfortunately it is the fastest and easiest way however and that is why I think a lot of authors are opting for it.

If you really want to promote your books most effectively then you have to become part of the blogosphere, plain and simple. You have to spend the time to cultivate a readership which means regular posts on interesting topics. You can write about writing which many authors successfully do (Caitlin Kiernan, Cherie Priest) or you can write about all kinds of other things you are interested inl (Beth Kephart, John Scalzi, Neil Gaiman, Justine Larbalestier, etc.) You can reach out directly to your readership (especially if you are a YA writer) like John Green has so brilliantly done or you can just reach out in a general sense to whoever might be reading. You need to post and you need to comment sometimes on other blogs. You need sit down, google "literary review blog" or "YA review blog" or Science fiction review blog" or "kidlit blog" - whatever your genre is and then click on some of what shows up and from that starting point follow the links on their sidebars to other similar sites.

Basically you have to invest some serious time - like several days at least - into wrapping your head around what goes on out here. You need to find blogs that resonate with you; find bloggers who write about books you like in ways that you respect and you need to become part of those conversations.

As painful as it sounds, you need to try to understand this place before just sending out mass emails asking us to help you sell your book. Because frankly, the bloggers you are going to get on those mass emails likely won't help your sales much and the ones who are insulted by them (can you believe someone sent Roger this kind of email???) are going to delete it in seconds.

In the end, the slow steady way has a huge payoff. Folks do hear about you and your books. I've been reading Cherie Priest's LJ for years because she's funny and smart and I like her style. Based on writing and research posts I've gotten excited about each of her new titles and read them and then written about them to let others know as well. By taking the time to engage with her readers Cherie has made her fans even bigger fans and we have spread the love about her books which is exactly what an author hopes for. The same is true of Beth Kephart and Sara Zarr and many many others. (Heck John Scalzi has a whole army at his site.) You can certainly throw money at marketing your book and it will get you some response but if you are in for the long haul then you have to spend time and establish a blog that you regularly post to and engages your readers. It is the number one thing I would recommend to ever author out there. You can spend less than half an hour a day, 4-5 days a week on this and really, you'd be spending that time on pr and marketing anyway so why not do it right?

In so many ways it is a great time to be a writer because you can positively affect the sales of your book. But you have to put in the time to do it right and inviting me to join your blog tour when you don't even know my name is not the way to do it. And please - just take Roger off your mass mail list, okay?

comments

Oh amen. I felt really nervous when I put up my 'I am not interested in your offers of books and tours random publishers' post because I thought it would piss a lot of people off, but lately I see lots of other bloggers are also not keen on tours and offers of free books because of the lack of real connection and etiquette in the publicists proposal.

I've taken two free books so far and participated in one tour. The two books I took were from authors who'd read my blog and picked up on my comments at other places. The tour stop was for a fellow blogger, who I'd say is a good blogging acquaintance now. I was happy to devote some time to these people because not only were their books interesting, but I could feel the connection that comes from talking to another human being.

I have enough genuine stuff to keep myself and my typing fingers involved, I do not need to clog my schedule with parenting books, self help manuals and memoirs when a publisher can not even begin an email with my name, let alone decide what pitches I am most likely to respond to. It's shoddy marketing and it lacks courtesy, connection, all the things that help to make your business stand out from the others.

Thought I would share my latest pitch with you:

"The book has all the ingredients for a killer satire: insanity, a deity, space aliens and the quest for the Ultimate Orgasm . . . . If you are interested, I would love to send a copy."

Hmmm . . . yeah. What is it about my blog that makes this author (who did not address me by name) think I'm interested in space aliens and the quest for the ultimate orgasm?

9/10 book review pitches/blog tour invitations are spammy. But the ones who do it right . . . wow, I must admit they get my attention because they do it the way it's supposed to be done.

Gee Natasha - what is it about your blog that would attract an ultimate orgasm book? HA!

So lame, all of it. But on a more serious note, authors are paying for this service - they think it is the way to approach the blogosphere and they are wrong and it's really rather sad.

Very well said! (I'm new to your blog, Colleen and it is quickly becoming one of my must-reads.) I've often thought of myself as a bit of an odd bird type of book blogger because I've never participated in a blog tour. Hell, I've never even received (or been offered) an ARC.

Maybe this is a good thing, in a way ...

I have it written, in very clear terms on my About page JUST ABOVE MY EMAIL that I don't want any ARCs, blog tours, etc. And I still get emails. I don't get it. To get my email you must read the note that I don't want ARCs. That's a big turn off. I really like Roger's response: Why would I invite you into my blog "home" if you don't listen/read to what I have to say in the first place?!

On the other hand, a publicist wrote to me a personal note, referencing a few of my posts, noting that I said I didn't want ARCS, and just gave me a heads up that she was reading and wanted to say "good work." That was nice. She actually treated me like a person. Still not interested in her books, but at least this is a human being.

I like this post very much! I have to say I think the blog tours have changed book blogging in the past few months, but I suspect it's going to have to change again. It seems people are burned out from accepting *SO MANY* ARCs and people are sick of seeing the same books in the Google Reader subject line.

Agreed! I rarely accept ARCs or tours that have been pitched to me (although I do request ARCs now and then for books that I'm interested in). The ones pitching seem to have never read my blog and often seem to be blanketing the Internet with free copies to every blogger out there. I'm not interested in contributing to annoying oversaturation for the sake of a free book.

The few times I accepted pitches for a review copy the pitches came from authors or publicists who had read my blog and had some sense of my taste. (And in two of those cases, the book was one I was interested in before the pitch.) Also, although I had seen these books reviewed on a few blogs, they weren't everywhere. The authors seemed to be targeting, not blanketing.

When I see a book on a tour and in my reader every day with generic publisher summaries and interviews, I usually actively decide not to read that book, which in some cases might be a shame. Every now and then, I see a review after the blitz is over that makes me think it might not be an awful book, but once that oversaturation line is crossed it's hard to win me over.

I agree with Teresa, I hate oversaturation. Blog tour interviews are also so blah. It always feels like blogger is trying to sell me a book as opposed to simply telling me about a book they truly care about and think I should know about. Any book that keeps popping up on blog tours I ignore. Sometimes when I see the book in the bookstore, I get a little taste of
throw-up in my mouth.


And, not to kick a dead horse, but the oversaturation that happens from many a blog tour means that the whole blogosphere is talking about the same thing -- and leaves out many multicultural books and reinforces the idea that there's no readership for these books and thus no reason to carry them in bookstores and school libraries. I vastly prefer the smörgåsbord offered up by the Blog Blast Tours, where we actually make an effort to reach out to the underserved ethnic and gender genres within YA and children's lit.

i had a publicist once offer to send me a book, which i was interested in, only to discover after the fact was part of a blog tour. they assumed ahead of time that i wouldn't turn down the opportunity and sent out publicity with my blog's name as being part of the tour in a "reminder" email about the author's availability for interviews.

yeah, so i really didn't like the book. had i been a younger blogger i might have felt obliged to say something nice, or afraid that i might not ever see another free book, and i realized then i felt more like i was being used rather than included in publicity.

perhaps there are bloggers out there who don't mind being an arm of the media or publicity departments, and maybe there are blog readers out there who are really into blog blast tours, but not me.

maybe i'm missing something here, but when an author does a physical tour i don't follow them from town to town to hear what different questions they are asked. and when i hear people doing publicity on the radio or television shows, after the first time it feels a little bit stale: either i was hooked the first time i heard them or i wasn't. so when i see an author doing the rounds on a number of blogs in a particular week am i supposed to want to visit all those blogs? am i supposed to visit the one blog on the one day that interests me most? should i be making calendar appointments to read a blog post?

somehow i fear this is all going to come back and haunt me should i ever get published...

This is such a tricky issue, especially for someone who publishes online. Sure, I blogged for quite a while, but I'm not convinced that the people who read my fiction are the same as those who read my blog. There are exceptions, but for the most part it seems that people come to a writer's blog because of their books, not the other way round, though they may stay if the blog offers something special. In other words, there blogs I read, and books I read, but not necssarily by the same writer.

I've stopped blogging for the moment, partly because it's time-consuming, partly because I'm trying to determine which direction to take with it. I'm a slow writer, and to blog well would take a lot more than half an hour per day. And unlike most bloggers (most writers?), the only way I really want to connect with my readers is through my fiction.

So I'm at least not tempted to pitch for a tour, online or off... but I'm always surprised by how enraged people get by what they consider a breach of blogging etiquette.

I love Blog Blast Tours. It's always a diverse group of authors who don't get enough coverage. It doesn't feel as if the bloggers are trying to sell me something but rather introducing me to an author. The questions and answers aren't stale and stiff but alive with heart. I love that.

Just asked to do my first blog tour. I like the books. Enjoy selling them and even reviewed one but I don't do blog tours. They said they would ship out the prize book as soon as possible. So bloggers have to pay to ship out the prizes to the winners, really! So if I said yes, I would be doing it for free and be responsible for S&H. That's crazy. Does anyone know if that's always the case.

Though I won't do it was still happy to be asked. When I read the email I felt like Steve Martin in the Jerk, when he got mail for the first time - I AM SOMEBODY

I just realized I got that whole Jerk thing wrong. It was phone books not mail. Still a classic scene even though I jacked it up.

I've been reading your blog for a couple of years now . . . this is a great post on blogging and internet presence, lots of good things to think about, as well as some good perspective on doing blog tours. I've been thinking for several months I wanted to do a blog tour when my novel comes out next summer, but I think now I'll approach it in a different way as well as the dos and don'ts of approaching potential reviewers.

And yet, I can't help hoping you might stumble across my middle-grade novel, THE HEALING SPELL (July, 2010, Scholastic), since it's set in the bayous of Louisiana and features a Cajun traiteur . . . it sounds like we both love that region of the South. ;-D

Hey David - I totally sympathize with the PR rep taking advantage of you but wanted to clarify that the "blog blast tour" that Tanita referred to is the one I organize twice and year and features a week of different authors being interviewed across about a dozen blogs. Each author is interviewed usually only once (sometimes we have two part interviews with an author so they run at two different blogs but the interviews are coordinated and never include duplicate questions). I'll post more on this shortly but the reason we even designed the Winter & Summer Blog Blast Tours was to do something different - no more of that insane following the same author to 20 or 30 different blogs where everyone says the same thing.

And yes, Kimberly you are right - I have a fondness for LA and will keep an eye out for your book!

Oh and Lee - point taken that not every author can or will blog but please understand that while I am not "enraged" the frustration over receiving numerous spam emails from pr reps can build when it happens every single day. Also I think that authors are just being taken advantage of by these marketing folks - they are not getting the kind of response they expect because many online book reviewers get so many of these emails we simply delete them immediately.

It's the authors I feel for - the rest of us can just delete and move on.

aquafortis [TypeKey Profile Page]

I like that Teresa brought up the publishers/publicists who are actually doing it right--the ones who are targeting rather than blanketing. I don't accept a huge amount of ARCs but it really makes a difference to how I feel about your e-mail if you a) bother to address me personally, b) know what kinds of books we (i.e. me and Tanita) tend to blog about, and especially c) have bothered to take note of my reading taste in some form.

One of my pet peeves is publicists who send e-mails (or worse, unsolicited books) completely inappropriate to our blog, like the one who kept sending me books and toys for small children even after I contacted two different individuals at the company. For a while after the Cybils last year, I was having a real problem with unsolicited books arriving at my house because of the publishers and marketers having my address as a Cybils panelist. I mean, it's hard to complain about free books, but I'm also not a marketing tool.

The other thing I hate is the lack of courtesy issue that Roger mentioned in his post. Not to sound like a fuddy-duddy, but if I don't know you and have never heard of you, please don't open your e-mail with "Hey Sarah" if you want me to take you seriously. (The person who did that is the same person we've been discussing on the e-mail list, incidentally.)

On a more positive note, I feel so lucky and so happy to be part of this group of bloggers and author/bloggers, for so many reasons. Not least because I can post a complainy rant like this and you won't shun me. :D

When I read Roger's post a few days ago, I smiled (for he had rendered his own response with his brilliant, edgy glee). But I recognize just how hard all of you work out here, and I feel a deep sadness when I think of you receiving, um, orgasm offers from those who don't have the distinct pleasure of knowing just who you are, and what you try to do with time that you steal from other aspects of your lives.

Thanks for the mention, Colleen. What do you think of my latest theory, that selling books via blogs is inherently self-defeating because you are asking people to step away from the computer, where, one hopes, they are reading something they like, for free, and go spend money on some other kind of reading? Yeah, it's got some holes in it. At least I hope so!

Speaking as an author and not a publisher or publicist... I blog - not because I feel I HAVE to, but because I (mostly) enjoy it (at the times that I do not, I don't blog...) I follow, somewhat haphazardly, a whole slew of blogs which are concerned with the kind of stuff I like to read and/or the kind of stuff I write (the two are intersecting circles, but not always identical, not by a long shot - there are books I love to read that I would never in a thousand years have attempted to write, for any number of valid reasons). Not only do I blog personally (I'm at livejournal, anghara.livejournal.com, do drop by and visit...) but I am part of two group blogs (www.sfnovelists.com and www.storytellersunplugged.com) with a bunch of other writers, some of whom are far greater household names that I am - but we all have things to say and in group blogs we complement one another.

I don't always comment. Frankly, there aren't enough hours in a day. I'd need a whole another me to just sit and read blogs all day - and then make GENUINE and ELOQUENT comments which, you know, have something to actually contribute (I don't believe a "ditto" post cuts it - either I have something to say, or I don't squawk at all). So I have to use my time relatively constructively.

I was delighted to have been a part of the Summer Blog Tour in the kidlitosphere this year. I'm always happy to have a presence in the blogosphere of any stripe because there are plenty of folks like me, people who might read and lurk and not necessarily get vocal and it's always a good thing to have one's name and one's work out there where people can get reminded of it.

WOuld I send books to places which don't want 'em? Would I barge in to places where I was not invited? No, I would not. I might occasionally send out a query to a blogger whom I might discover on a serendipitous chance and who seems like they might be interested in the stuff that I do. Sometimes that works. Sometimes it doesn't. It's nice to be invited, but sometimes you can knock on a door yourself, so long as you identify yourself as a caller of the non-proselytizing sort, and see if the householder is willing to talk about things with you.

I sincerely hope I haven't committed the crassness of barging into houses uninvited, or standing on people's doorsteps banging away for hours at a closed door simply because I know that the occupants must be home and assume that the only reason that they won't open the door is that they can't hear me knocking (so if I keep knocking, loudly and long, they'll HAVE to take notice...)

But frankly... the blogosphere is where it's at. If there's a buzz on the blogs, there's a buzz on the street. It's the price of your own success, ladies and gents - you are the makers of public opinion these days. And those of us to whom a good public opinion - heck, any public opinion - can be life or death, we salute you.

And we may occasionally blunder with you.

Hi Colleen, yes, I understand the frustration. I guess we're all in new territory and simply trying to find our way. I would love to be able to blog as well as you do, for example, but I just don't seem to have it in me!

May I add a word about Roger Sutton's 'latest theory' that selling books via blogs is inherently self-defeating?

For me there are two sides to this: on the one hand, I buy a lot of books, and buy them almost exclusively from online recommendations - not just blogs, though, also old media reviews online (The Guardian, for example), new media reviews (mostly online magazines) etc. This may be of course because I live in a nonEnglish-speaking country, so the internet is just about the only source of literary info.

On the other hand, my own readership is primarily an online one, so I'm not about to ask anyone to step away from their computers. But it's best not to equate online reading with all forms of e-reading, and people are evidently spending money on ebooks. Will this increase over time? With the right technology (and cheaper technology!) and the right publishing models, I believe so. I like for example, what the new online magazine Electric Literature is attempting:

http://www.electricliterature.com/

At this point, just the subject line of a book pitch from an author can turn me off. It could be a great book, but I've received too many dull letters and I shudder to think what the book would be like.

Post a comment

Comment preview:




Newest Colleen in Lit World