
I wanted to let this subject go for a little bit and blog about some new Tor books and my deep excitement for what Libba Bray is working on but JL Bell has a long post up in response to my Bookslut feature and Roger picked that up and responded as well and so here I am again. The bit being discussed is about gatekeepers potentially keeping books by People of Color or with Kids of Color from Caucasian readers because they feel those readers will not identify and thus not buy those books. I thought the numbers on Millicent Min and authors like Gene Yang and Walter Dean Myers and Sherman Alexie (award winners, big sellers) had proven that Caucasian readers will read about characters of a different race and thus I wanted to point out the oddness of this persisting belief in my piece. Bell disagrees:
Sadly, in this world we have to consider the possibility that people—even kids—don’t behave the way we wish they would. Some, even many, “Caucasian readers” may enjoy books about “Kids of Color” equally with books about white kids. But as long as some don’t, their numbers can be enough to affect sales or circulation in a noticeable way. That preference doesn’t have to be vocalized, or even conscious, to exist.
People have no difficulty acknowledging that books about boys generally have more appeal for boys (especially at certain ages), and books about girls have more appeal to girls. Lots of folks agree that teenaged boys are turned off by pink covers. Much of the pressure on our field to create more books about kids of color is based on the idea that those titles would hold more appeal for kids of color than yet more books about white kids.
So is it really impossible to imagine that books about white kids have more appeal in the aggregate for white kids? Or is it just uncomfortable? Do we really have evidence that kids are colorblind? Or do we have evidence that they aren’t?
I don't think it's fair to throw pink covers out there because please. Pink covers? Let's just not go there. But as to the assertion that Caucasian kids won't reads books about Kids of Color because they don't and won't identify with them and that's just the way it is, well, sorry. I'm not buying it. It used to be that way in Hollywood. It used to be that White audiences would not watch movies with Black actors. Until it changed. And how about tv? Remember when The Cosby Show was revolutionary and no one thought it would succeed? Yeah. Those were the days. Hell, my mother can tell you stories about Black singers not being perceived as marketable to White audiences. And we all know how that turned out.
But somehow, a kid that will plunk $10 down to watch Will Smith and listens to Beyonce and The Black-Eyed Peas without blinking an eye and watches everything from Degrassi to CSI without paying the slightest bit of attention to what color everyone is in the midst of the dramrama, can not be expected to read a book about a teenager who is a different race.
I'm not buying it.
More from Bell:
The quoted passage above implies that it’s not “acceptable to still believe” that white kids prefer books about other white kids. But if all the numbers add up that way, it would be a fact, however discomfiting, and we should believe it. Especially since today’s publishing and bookselling corporations are designed to respond to the facts of the market, not to change society.
The numbers are faulty, because the numbers are based on the sale of books by publishers that largely do not market books about Kids of Color in the same way as Caucasian kids. Kids of Color are often marketed as curriculum based, as educational, as message books, as "different". Those that are mainstreamed do find great success. Millicent Min sold 450,000 copies with an Asian girl on the cover. Is that an aberration? Is Sherman Alexie an aberration? Is Kiki Strike with its multi cultural cast an aberration? Why must we think they succeeded in spite of their Kids of Color rather than proving that Kids of Color can be popular and high selling?
I understand that publishers only want to make money - I totally get that and agree with it. My point is that the literary world is using an outdated model to determine what succeeds and it is predicated on race (and sexuality) trumping story. This model does not exist in any other facet of pop culture. We all love Will Smith - why can't we all love Varian Johnson and Colson Whitehead and Mitali Perkins too?
I think publishers should be buying more diverse books and marketing them better. And I think gatekeepers (ALL of them) need to rethink their own preconceived notions about Kids & Authors of Color (and GBLTQ characters). That was my point. Do that enough and the readers will follow. If you don't believe me then go take a look at the 1960s and see what happened with rock and roll. Change back then meant a lot more money for everybody - something any publisher should be willing to take a bet on.
[Post pic: "A jam session from the 1960s features Kim Weston (microphone) Stevie Wonder(dark glasses), Berry Gordy Jr. at the piano, Smokey Robinson (center rear) and Marv Johnson, at Gordy's left. From The Detroit News. ]


![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.chasingray.com/nav-commenters.gif)






February 4
2010
10:41 PM
So basically Kids of Color read about White protagonist all the time and the stories with KOC are limited but doesn't work the other way.
"But, mommy, mommy I want to read more stories with people who look like me"
"Sorry, kiddo - Its their world you're just living in it"
WTF.
I totally agree about marketing MG/YA books with KOC get no promotions.
Look at Julia Alvarez's 09 release Return to Sender from Random House. I only heard about this book because I searched their website. Alvarez is a well known name is fiction. Many of my customers are more familiar with her than Alexie. Though Random House didn't even give half as much PR to Return to Sender as Little Brown did for Alexie's YA novel.
Some may think this comparison is apples and oranges because Alexie's novel has a larger audience appeal. But Return to Sender is a wonderful story and I think some adult fans of Alvarez would have enjoyed being able to share one of her books with their child or childern if they had known about.
YA can be overwhelming for parents with all the choices. But if parents see a name they're familiar with thanks to the author's adult fiction they will be more willing to give it a go for their child.
Also, I am not naive enough to think Return to Sender would be a bestseller. But when looking at sales numbers one should also look to promotions numbers as well.