RSS: RSS Feed Icon

I was feeling positive about all this querying business until I read this bit at the Missouri Review:

Acceptance rates for electronic and regular submissions are the same: currently, less than 1%.

Pardon me while I sink into the slough of despair. One percent? Really? That's like the most devastating slush pile comment I've ever read. It makes me think I just hugely wasted my time on THE BELIEVER and TIN HOUSE because they probably get way more submissions. (I might have slightly better odds at ZYZZVYA and RIVER TEETH as they are somewhat smaller markets. At least that's what I'm telling myself.)

Okay, I'm over it. The whining stops now, promise.

I have another essay that should be good to go tomorrow (I just have to make sure they can standalone and are not dependent on the rest of the book to explain characters relationships, etc. Most of these are all pretty close to that anyway.). I was thinking to send it to the MISSOURI REVIEW but now I'm thinking maybe GEORGIA REVIEW as I likely have a snowball's chance in hell at MISSOURI. But then I was wondering if it would be better for me to stick to more western publications (the one I sent to THE BELIEVER was about St Exupery so not so regional). Westerners might be more inclined to take a chance on the Alaska setting.

But then again, other locations might find Alaska more appealing as it is something different. (This is why writers go insane you know - it's not the writing, it's the trying to get to get published.)

Beyond writing news (and really this blog should not be so much about writing), there is a ton of reading. I'm finishing up a nonfiction book on vampires from National Geographic which is quite interesting as it looks at the long literary and medical history of the myth. Great stuff and perfect for vamp loving teens - especially if they want to write a book report on their favorite subject but haven't found a title that's acceptable to teacher yet. I'm also deep in titles for the upcoming Booklist focused on science titles - lots of psychology and genetics and that kind of thing. All interesting in one way or another although none is really my personal cup to tea (but easy to recommend).

For the October column I've got two books on the less savory history of the south: THEY CALLED THEMSELVES THE KKK and SPIES OF MISSISSIPPI. Seems like if I'm going to do my annual scary books column then I should include the truly scary, don't you think?

Plus I'm finishing up THE VERY BEST OF CHARLES de LINT for a standalone review. I've actually read most of these stories before but it's a good chance to show new readers how to get to know his writing and why it's so great. (He's a must for urban fantasy fans, hands down.)

And I've going through A UNIVERSAL HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF BOOKS just because it is interesting (although rather depressing) and Jack Kerouac's journals - but that's for my western book. And Jincey WIllet's WRITING CLASS because I need something fun! ha! (Just finished Carrie Vaughn's KITTY AND THE SILVER BULLET - Big fun and I'm loving the heck out this series.)

I also just finished Amber Benson's MG ghost story AMONG THE GHOSTS and it was a cute little Nancy Drewish mystery that included elements of Scooby Doo wackery, boarding school setting and why scientists can generally not be trusted. Overall very nice for the 8-12 set and will be reviewed in my October column. My only complaint is about the cover which just seems odd to me. The little girl is certainly "Noh" (short for Noleen) but the ghosts look creepy as all get out and the background looks like some kind of gothic nightmare but none of that is true. The dead kids are all fun and quirky and sweet (and drawn that way in the interior illustrations) and nothing happens at night. This is a case where I think the pub might be trying to appeal to readers who aspire to TWILIGHT but are too young for it but they are going to miss the kids of the correct age who just want a fun adventure story. It's some false advertising, that's for sure.

My reading pile is really absurd in a lot of ways. It's totally all over the place and to a certain degree drives me crazy. But on the flip side I find it is a kind of crazy that helps me write and makes me think and that's all good. Mostly right now I just want to get the October column done as I'm still a bit behind from AK this summer. I want to get a jump on Nov and Dec very soon. (Nov is "Tell Me the Truth" - nothing on Dec yet other than rich fun novels, I think.)

comments

Have you ever read a slush pile? Seriously, you're already in the top percentage of what they get and they haven't even opened the file yet.

(I will say I have heard lots of horror stories about how long it takes such journals to respond. But if you're putting your insanely impressive credentials in your cover letter, you should be getting cherry-picked to the top of the stack. You can simultaneous sub at some/most of these places, right?)

Wendy McClure

What Gwenda said. And I was coming to say...

At the small children's book publisher where I work, we have a 1% acceptance rate as well, but at least half our slush is wildly inappropriate stuff from people who haven't bothered to research our house. There are a lot of folks out there who blindly send out to every open-submissions-policy publisher in the Writer's Market because they think it's a numbers game. Mail merge has made it awfully easy for people to mass-mail submissions, and email makes it even easier still. So while it seems like a big pond, it's a much smaller pool if you've done your homework and have some good publication credits, which you do.

You know I never have actually seen a slush pile but I think I'm still reeling from the horrors of querying ten years ago (when I got the one essay back with "OKAY to trash" written across the top.) Of course I was not a particularly good writer back then at all, so I'm not surprised that I got nowhere but still, paranoia reigns supreme.

You would think after the amazing positive Strange Horizons experience I'd be feeling more confident but this AK book is kicking my butt.

The turnaround times are anywhere from four weeks to six months from the whole group I've sent out to. I still have a couple more to get out the door by next week and then a fiction piece that I'd like to standalone as well but will require more work to do so. That's my last one.

I think by then I'll have 8 individual pieces to more than a dozen markets (due to simultaneous subs at some) and I'll be able to rotate them around if/when they get returned.

You know what it is, really? I thought i was past this - which I should never have thought - and so I'm rather kicking and screaming my way through it. But I shall survive; I'm just sharing every whiny moment as it occurs!! Ha!

I loved They Called Themselves the kkk.

Spies of Mississippi not so much. I needed more.

Colleen this blog can be about anything you want it to be about. And I like the extra e.

Doret - just finished SPIES and have the exact same response as you. How Bowers managed to make such a fascinating topic seem dull is beyond me. This topic deserves a much bigger, much more illustrated (what was Nat Geo thinking skimping on photos???)title. I loved learning what I did but was left wanting, confused and frustrated by the experience. I recommend the book just because you don't find this stuff pretty much anywhere else, but someone needs to take the topic and run with it, big time.

And a novel about these events would be AWESOME.

Post a comment